Logo-0

www.amperspective.com Online Magazine

Executive Editor: Abdus Sattar Ghazali

About us | AMP comment | Muslims in politics | Special reports | Press center | Opinion | Civil liberties | Contact us

HOME PAGE

Opinion 2008

Opinion 2007

Opinion 2006

Opinion 2005

Press Center 2008

Press Center 2007

Press Center 2006

Press Center 2005

Press Center 2003-2004

Anti Muslim smear

Muslim charities
 

Washington Post - August 5, 2005

Pakistani Community in California was taped

By DON THOMPSON

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Federal officials disclosed Friday that they secretly tape-recorded Pakistanis in the agricultural community of Lodi for nearly three years before bringing terror-related charges against a father and son and seeking to deport two Islamic leaders.

Fifty tapes in Urdu and Pashto were turned over this week to lawyers for Hamid Hayat, 22, and his father, Umer Hayat, 47.

The son is charged with lying to the FBI about attending a terrorism camp in Pakistan in 2003 and 2004. His father is charged with lying when he denied his son had attended such a camp.

The tapes are among scores of recordings made by an informant or undercover investigator starting in August 2002, prosecutors and defense attorneys said during a preliminary hearing Friday.

The Hayats' trial was scheduled to begin Aug. 23, but U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. delayed it Friday, saying the volume of evidence being gathered is so great it will take at least an extra 60 days to consider which classified materials can be used. He set another hearing for Oct. 7.

The Hayats weren't the initial targets of the investigation in Lodi, a town of 62,000 about 30 miles south of Sacramento, and prosecutors said they have had to pare out other taped conversations and re-record the edited tapes.

"They're selectively picking and choosing what they're giving us," objected Wazhma Mojaddidi, Hamid Hayat's attorney.

Umer Hayat's attorney, Johnny Griffin III, said the case should be dismissed because of government delays in turning over evidence, but Burrell ruled prosecutors were moving with due speed…..

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/05/AR2005080501751.html